What could you do to help support an branch us out.
To protect UK road users.
Our family’s an children are at risk.
todays formation as we look into protecting the UK’s dominion
absolutely waste of human excrement.
Independents is the key.
Professor Johnson, today cast.
It’s usual equalities.
Formation
An enthusiastic episode.
It’s characteristics
It’s emphasizes
It’s characterised
It’s UK road users safe guided abilitations. An to show respect for legal authorities. The law divides the law multiples.
It’s becoming very essential to subscribe an share it’s content of Proclamation News and Gatherence.
It’s vocal it’s extraordinary.
I’m an independent operator, a human safe gaurded navigator, I’m like a Independent superman a RoboCop like minded UK road user instigator.
We are cheaper than the Daily mail.
It’s free to air..
So stay tuned in:
Todays modern society we take a look at UK roads.
Safety within the infrastructure.
So think first think safety.
Do not enter your car under the influence of alcohol
Do not enter the car under influence of narcotics
Do not enter the car under sleep deprivation
Making sure you an the passengers on board have seat safety belts on an babies have seat belt adapter adjacent to the car seat.
Check engine coolant tank an engine oil are filled up to the maximum level.
Check tryes for psi limits before take of, an also trye treads an the tryes are no bold.
Look out for road safety signs.
An further road police safety signs
Check both your wing mirrors an centre mirror before acting an turning into another direction or over taking making sure pedestrians an motorcycle are not over taking.
Plan your destination.
Its the UK road guidelines, to give you some acknowledgement of road congestions, roadworks an car accidents.
Soit’s very benificail to subscribe show your support give me some encouragement, an share to keep not only me but others safety within the UK road.
Please call 999 or 101 for emergency an legal authorities assistance.
But please have some Forbearance as our police are very busy day to day.
With racketeering, theft an many other road incidents.
Our Firebirgade are busy with many fires, office, fields etc
an giving our children at school the P.A.T. down talk to our children at school, fireman Sam says do not play with fires or matches
An our NHS are very busy with many elder patients hip operations, heart an disease, cancer an may people have trip slips or falls at work. .
Did you no the most deaths at work are caused by slips trips or falls at work.
Think safety think first
Colchester A133Slow traffic, in the Construction AreaSlow traffic on A133 St Andrew’s Avenue at A137 Harwich Road. In the construction area. Contraflow in operation.19 Feb 2020, 8:06AM (first reported)
Colchester Temporary Traffic Signals, telecoms WorkTemporary traffic signals due to telecoms work on A1124 Lexden Road near Glen Avenue.17 Feb 2020, 1:48PM (first
Weeley A133Queueing Traffic, in the Construction AreaQueueing traffic on A133 Colchester Road at B1033. In the construction area. Lane closures on approach to the roundabout.19 Feb 2020, 7:26AM (first reported
Potters Bar greater London M25Emergency Repairs, lane (or Lanes) closed, traffic coping wellOne lane closed due to emergency repairs on M25 anticlockwise after J23 A1(M) J1 (South Mimms). Traffic is coping well. Lane one (of four) is closed for emergency barrier repairs following a barrier strike.18 Feb 2020, 10:38AM (first reported)
Aristocracy Social Elite: The 90% of the population this morning hanging out there behind, you complete monstrosity, i feel gutted for you absolutly gutted for you, ya complete mess.
All the loveable photos images an gifts we see yesterday posted all over social media, and now youve woken up with aching genitals an sore heads.
haha gutted, that’s Populism taking its tool.
now with todays formation as we look into protecting the UK’s dominion
absolutely waste of human excrement.
Independents is the key.
Professor Johnson, today cast.
It’s usual equalities.
Formation
An enthusiastic episode.
It’s characteristics
It’s emphasizes
It’s characterised
It’s UK road users safe guided abilitations. An to show respect for legal authorities. The law divides the law multiples.
It’s becoming very essential to subscribe an share it’s content of Proclamation News and Gatherence.
It’s vocal it’s extraordinary.
I’m an independent operator, a human safe gaurded navigator, I’m like a Independent superman a RoboCop like minded UK road user instigator.
We are cheaper than the Daily mail.
It’s free to air..
So stay tuned in:
Todays modern society we take a look at UK roads.
Safety within the infrastructure.
So think first think safety.
Do not enter your car under the influence of alcohol
Do not enter the car under influence of narcotics
Do not enter the car under sleep deprivation
Making sure you an the passengers on board have seat safety belts on an babies have seat belt adapter adjacent to the car seat.
Check engine coolant tank an engine oil are filled up to the maximum level.
Check tryes for psi limits before take of, an also trye treads an the tryes are no bold.
Look out for road safety signs.
An further road police safety signs
Check both your wing mirrors an centre mirror before acting an turning into another direction or over taking making sure pedestrians an motorcycle are not over taking.
Plan your destination.
Its the UK road guidelines, to give you some acknowledgement of road congestions, roadworks an car accidents.
Soit’s very benificail to subscribe show your support give me some encouragement, an share to keep not only me but others safety within the UK road.
Please call 999 or 101 for emergency an legal authorities assistance.
But please have some Forbearance as our police are very busy day to day.
With racketeering, theft an many other road incidents.
Our Firebirgade are busy with many fires, office, fields etc
an giving our children at school the P.A.T. down talk to our children at school, fireman Sam says do not play with fires or matches
An our NHS are very busy with many elder patients hip operations, heart an disease, cancer an may people have trip slips or falls at work. .
Did you no the most deaths at work are caused by slips trips or falls at work.
Think safety think first
A 39-year-old woman was killed in a crash today between a lorry and a car on the A5 near Weston Park.
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
on Proclamation news and Gatherence..
Police cordoned off the A5 near the crash scene. Photo: Newport SNT.
The woman, the driver of the car, was pronounced dead at the scene near Shifnal after paramedics found her in a serious condition just after 9am.
The crash led to severe delays for drivers in the area, with the A5 shut between Crackley Bank and Pickmere Island, where the A5 crosses the A41 on the Shropshire/Staffordshire border.
The road remains closed at this time.
West Midlands Ambulance Service spokesman Jamie Arrowsmith said: “On arrival we discovered the driver of the car, a woman, in a serious condition.
“She was quickly rescued from the vehicle by ambulance staff who immediately began administering advanced life support.
“However, despite their best efforts it unfortunately became apparent that nothing could be done to save her and she was confirmed dead at the scene.
“The driver of the lorry, a man, was assessed but uninjured in the incident.”
The Midlands Air Ambulance was called to the scene, as well as an ambulance and a paramedic officer.
Diversions were in place and motorists were advised to avoid the area.
A West Mercia Police spokesman said: “At 9.10am this morning police responded to a report of a collision on the A5 near Burlington, Shifnal, involving two vehicles. A section of the road is closed while emergency services deal with the incident.”
Enquiries are ongoing and police are appealing for witnesses, including any motorists on the road this morning with dash cam footage.
Anyone with information should contact Pc Andy Burrell on 101 ext 5785.
‘Disgruntled’ former Waymo self-driving car operator arrested for causing car crash
The 31-year-old swerved his car in front of the autonomous vehicle and then slammed on his brakes
A former Waymo contractor was arrested after allegedly forcing one of the company’s self-driving cars to crash in Tempe last month, according to AZ Central. Police say 31-year-old Raymond Tang drove his Mazda recklessly around the Waymo vehicle, eventually swerving in front of the self-driving car and slamming his brakes, causing the Waymo vehicle to rear-end him.
The collision was captured on video by the Waymo vehicle’s cameras and posted online by ABC15. A dark Mazda can be seen swerving several times in front of the Waymo vehicle before eventually slamming on the brakes and causing a minor fender-bender.
Waymo, which has the same parent company as Google, operates hundreds of self-driving minivans in the suburbs of Phoenix, Arizona, where it runs a limited ride-hailing service for around 1,000 customers.
The Waymo vehicle was being driven manually by a human safety driver at the time of the crash. Tang admitted to “brake-checking the Waymo” in a later interview with police, according to AZ Central. The Waymo safety driver went to the hospital for her injuries and asthma-related difficulties, according to court records.TANG WORKED FOR GENESIS10
Tang worked for Genesis10, one of the third-party contractors that supplies autonomous vehicle operators to Waymo, until he was fired a year ago when he “failed to meet the high safety standards,” a spokesperson for the company said in a statement. Tang was also involved in an incident on January 30th, which resulted in misdemeanor charges for disorderly conduct and criminal damage against him, the spokesperson said.
“Incidents such as this one reinforce the importance of Procs mission: to make it safe for people to get where they’re going and to help save the thousands of lives now lost to traffic crashes caused by humans,”
The global gender gap across health, education, economic opportunity and politics has closed by only 4 per cent in the past 10 years, with the economic gap closing by just 3 per cent, suggesting it will take another 118 years to close this gap completely. (World Economic Forum, Global Gender Gap Report 2015)
Despite continued efforts, the under-representation of women in many key areas of global power and influence is evident. This is, of course, not a new issue. Earlier versions of gender gaps associated them with women’s biological, social and intellectual inferiority (as an 18th-century given) or with women’s ‘natural’ roles as carers, mothers, ‘womanly companions of men’ (as in the 19th-century ‘complementarity’ agenda). ‘Blame the brain’ was the mantra underpinning these essentialist justifications of the status quo – the biologically determined differences between men’s and women’s brains were viewed as the cause of these imbalances, and, most significantly, these differences were seen as ‘hard wired’, fixed and unchangeable.
A key breakthrough in our knowledge of the brain in this century, fuelled by the stunning technological advances in research, is that brain structure and function is not fixed and unchangeable, and not the same irrespective of context or culture. It is, in fact, exquisitely plastic, mouldable by experience throughout life. It is also ‘permeable’, responding to social attitudes and expectations, as is shown by brain-imaging studies of stereotype threat (Wraga et al., 2006).
Additionally, there is a challenge to the very concept of considering males and females as belonging to two separate, often ‘opposite’ categories. The accepted binary concept of sex needs revisiting. At all levels, biological and behavioural, males and females do not fall into two neat, separable categories, so the quest for differences between them could at best be uninformative and certainly misleading.
You might think that the possibilities offered by these breakthroughs would be seized on as ‘game-changers’ in the arena of research into sex differences and the brain. The development of powerful and sensitive techniques for studying the brain, paired with a new understanding of how the brain reflects the world in which it develops, should be revolutionising the research agenda and galvanising discussion in media outlets. Would that it were so!
My argument in this article is not just that there is a continued emphasis on ‘essentialist’, brain-based explanations in both public communication of, and research into, many forms of gender imbalance (although the appetite for this and the evident ‘confirmation’ bias is part of the problem: see Maney, 2014). The key difficulty is that this essentialist approach remains rooted in the deterministic past, with little or no acknowledgment of the significance that our emerging awareness of brain plasticity could and should have for the understanding of any differences between the sexes. This problem is magnified by a similar backward focus on historical beliefs in stereotyped sex differences, with little or no acknowledgement that previously accepted differences are being shown to be diminishing or disappearing with time (itself a challenge to a biological determinist perspective), or actually not to be differences at all.
An additional concern is that this sustained emphasis on an old-fashioned biological determinist argument can be a self-fulfilling prophecy. Where populist media and research findings support the notion that gender gaps arise from fixed, brain-based factors, there is greater endorsement of gender stereotypes, increased tolerance of the status quo, and belief in the impossibility of change (Brescoll & La France, 2004). It also reinforces the power of stereotype threat, which can itself change brain function (Wraga et al., 2006) but may also drive educational and occupational choices, thereby maintaining gender gaps, undermining determined initiatives to address them.
Let’s look at how those breakthroughs which should be contributing to this revolution in our understanding of sex differences are currently limited, for a range of reasons including basic misunderstanding of the technology, poor public communication of research, questionable scientific practice and the ‘confirmation bias’ that renders entrenched beliefs hard to shift.
Brain-imaging breakthroughs A key aspect in untangling the arguments about male and female brains is to have reliable and valid ways of providing accurate answers to the questions being asked. We need to move on from merely measuring differences in the size of structures or areas of activation, mapping them on to some kind of neophrenological template, feeding misleading concepts such as ‘right-brainedness’ or ‘brainsex’. We need to understand not differences in brains per se, but their role in those behavioural, temperamental, or cognitive differences between men and women that might contribute to imbalances in achievement.
Contemporary techniques do allow a much more detailed characterisation of what is going on in the brain, including tracking of structural pathways or connections, and identifying the comings and goings of networked patterns of activity in millisecond timescales (Sporns et al., 2005). Access to pooled datasets from many labs means there are participant cohorts of many hundreds if not thousands (Poldrack & Gorgolewski, 2014). Together with more complex approaches to modelling patterns of brain activity, these advances should allow detailed examination of the claims and counter claims in cognitive neuroscience research, increasing our understanding of the true nature of links between brain and behaviour, and possibly also dispelling many brain-based myths (Jarrett, 2014).
However, the public representation of findings from such techniques is not always accurate. ‘Neurotrash’ is a light-hearted term applied to the sometimes bizarre representations (or misrepresentations) of brain-imaging findings that can be found in the popular press. They mainly arise from a journalistic lack of awareness of the complexities and the limitations of brain-imaging techniques, famously characterised in the ‘dead salmon’ study (Bennett et al., 2011), and from a tendency to succumb to the ‘seductive allure’ of the brain images themselves (McCabe & Castel, 2008; Rhodes et al., 2014). The impression given that imaging techniques offer instantaneous, real-time access to our brains that can be ‘read back’ by researchers leads to over-hyped claims about the links between brains and just about anything from being a Republican to designing a kitchen. Such ‘neuroflapdoodle’ pieces are often cleverly critiqued within neuroscience circles (e.g. tinyurl.com/9lboz24), but the wider public sense is that imaging insights are continuing to offer support for existing beliefs about the causal links between brain and behaviour.
One of the areas where this problem manifests itself most powerfully is in the reporting of neuroimaging studies of sex differences. There appears to be an insatiable appetite for ‘at last, the truth will out’ stories: research has finally solved the centuries old conundrum of why ‘women can’t read maps and men can’t cry’ (Maney, 2014, 2016). For example, Daily Mail coverage of a recent report on sex differences in brain connectivity (Ingalhalikar et al., 2014) had the headline ‘Men’s and women’s brains: The truth’ and claimed that researchers had shown that ‘differences between the sexes are profound’. ‘Men generally have more connections within each hemisphere (which) means men are more logical and better at coordination’, the newspaper announced, concluding that ‘the differences between the genders were so profound that men and women might almost be separate species’. As has subsequently been widely reported, there were problems with the research paper itself, including failures to report the (very small) effect sizes in the comparisons they made, but in a detailed science communication case study, tracking reports of this study through press releases, online comments and blogs, it is clear that the take-home message from coverage of the study was of strong support for a biologically determinist perspective (O’Connor & Joffe, 2014).
The media may also ‘insert’ such a perspective where none exists. A recent survey of gender differences in various cognitive skills over different times and places showed some evidence of increased gender differences favouring women in some cognitive functions (like episodic memory) and decreases or elimination of gender differences in other cognitive abilities (Weber et al., 2014). This is what the authors focused on: ‘Our results suggest that these changes take place as a result of women gaining more than men from societal improvements over time, thereby increasing their general cognitive ability more than men.’ There was also evidence of a sustained but diminishing gender gap in favour of males in numeracy. It was the existence of this gap (and not its diminution) that the Daily Mail focused on. The headline read: ‘Female brains really ARE different to male minds with women possessing better recall and men excelling at maths’. Assuming that their readers might not make it back to the original study, they helpfully interpreted this particular finding: ‘It is thought the differing strengths can be explained by differences in the biology of the brain as well as in the way the sexes are treated by society.’
A quick scan of the original text reveals that neither the word ‘brain’ nor the word ‘biology’ appears. Such claims are associated with populist literature that harnesses neuroscience findings to ‘prove’ genuine differences between men and women and hand out associated advice (e.g. Gray, 1992; Maney, 2016). And they also continue to support the ‘blame the brain’ culture by failing to correct misplaced or outdated beliefs about male and female brains.
Neurosexism But this is just the Daily Mail, right? We can just sigh and move on, patting ourselves on the back at our own enlightened ways. No: ‘neurosexism’ is an even more serious problem. Cordelia Fine (2010, 2013, and The Psychologist, November 2010: see tinyurl.com/hpto3bu) draws attention to specific practices within the neuroimaging research community itself that serve to create ‘a literature biased toward the presentation of sex differences in the brain as extensive, functionally significant, and fixed – and therefore implicitly supportive of a gender essentialist perspective’ (Fine, 2013, p.369). As discussed above, findings from neuroimaging studies are proving to be attractive sources of support for deterministic belief, so it is important not only that the design and analysis of such studies are reflective of contemporary developments in the area, but also that researchers are sensitive to the potential public interpretation of what they are reporting.
If the purpose of the study is to link the data on sex differences in brain characteristics with sex differences in some aspect of human behaviour, then one would assume that some care would be taken to ensure the reliability of such behavioural differences, with an appropriate choice of task to demonstrate these. However, there are instances of brain-imaging studies where the neuroimaging data are interpreted in terms of behaviour that was not actually measured in the scanner (Ingalhalikar et al., 2014) or at all (Tomasi & Volkow, 2012 ). In the latter study, for example, findings of some sex differences in resting state connectivity were interpreted thus: ‘…we hypothesize that the men’s lower brain connectivity might reflect optimization of functions that require specialized processing, such as spatial orienting, whereas the women’s higher brain connectivity may optimize functions that require integration and synchronization across large cortical networks such as those supporting language’ (p.7). It does not appear that any measures of spatial orienting or language were obtained from these participants.
Similarly, where the focus is so firmly on proving the existence of brain-based differences as the bases for explaining gender inequalities, it is important to quantify the size of these differences and the extent to which they are meaningful, (i.e. of sufficient size and stability to reliably differentiate the two groups). In a research sphere where the differences being studied are extremely small and the distributions of measured variables almost always closely overlapping, then measures of effect size must be reported (Cohen, 1988). One of the criticisms of the Ingalhalikar et al. paper discussed above was that the ‘profound’ differences reported were actually rather small. No effect sizes were reported by the authors themselves, but subsequent analysis revealed that the largest effect size was small to moderate (0.482). It could also be revealing to report the proportion of possible comparisons in the data that were not significant to provide some sort of context. Jarrett (2015) pointed out that in another recent study on sex differences in functional connectivity, only 178 out of 34,716 measures of a particular aspect of connectivity were significantly different between males and females (effect size 0.32). Yet the authors refer to ‘prominent’ sex differences in their abstract (Satterthwaite et al., 2014).
So we do have the techniques that could allow us to resolve some of the arguments in this arena and really illustrate where any differences, if any, lie, and what these differences might mean. But misunderstanding of what these techniques can do, misuse in a research context and miscommunication of the associated findings currently serve to undermine their potential power to challenge stereotypical beliefs.
Brain plasticity Our brains renew themselves throughout life to an extent previously thought not possible. (Michael S. Gazzaniga)
One key breakthrough in our understanding of brain structure and function in the last 40 years or so is the concept of neuroplasticity – our brains can and do change, and this remains true throughout our lives. Where the ‘biology is destiny’-type arguments have stood in the way of progress towards understanding if and why male brains are different from female brains, new insights offered by an understanding of how plastic brains are should bring about greater attention to the factors in addition to biology which might determine a brain’s characteristics. It has been known for some time that specific events and exposure to specific types of learning experiences, such as taxi-driving, juggling or playing Tetris, can change both structure and function in the human brain (May, 2011; Shors, 2016). In addition, there is accumulating evidence that more intangible experiences – including exposure to social attitudes and expectations such as ‘stereotype threat’ or self-perceptions of status – can change brain structure and function. A study by Wraga and colleagues (2006) demonstrated that carrying out a spatial cognition task under either negative or positive stereotype threat conditions resulted in differences not only in performance but also in brain-activation patterns. The association between objectively measured socio-economic status and brain structure has been demonstrated (Hackman & Farah, 2009), but it has also been shown that perceived socio-economic status, or where you think you are in the pecking order, can affect brain structure, independently of other possible variables, such as ethnicity or psychological health. (Gianaros et al., 2007).
The significance of these findings is that they provide powerful evidence of how ‘entangled’ our brains are with the world (Fausto-Sterling, 2000; Rippon et al., 2014). It can take us beyond the old nature vs. nurture debate and illustrate the truly interactive nature by which our brain characteristics are formed (and can be changed), and how these characteristics then proceed to affect how we interact with the world. Acknowledgment of plasticity has changed thinking in many spheres of behavioural biology but has been strangely slow to feed through into questions of sex differences in the brain, the very research arena where the effect could be powerfully demonstrated (Fine et al., 2013).
With respect to the study of sex differences in the brain, acknowledging neuroplasticity should have significant consequences for research design and interpretation. The understanding of the potent ‘brain-changing’ effects of social and cultural influences means that a much wider range of factors should be accounted for when researching into this area or when offering explanations for differences. Educational experience, occupation and socio-economic status will need to be measured, or at least acknowledged as a potential source of variance. This will, for example, be important when it comes to looking for differences in the large neuroimaging datasets that are becoming available. If there is only minimal attention paid to the range of possibly relevant independent variables (e.g. just sex and age) in any interrogation of these data, then misleading conclusions could be reached. Currently, examination of many neuroimaging papers reporting evidence of sex differences in the brain shows that little, if any, attempt has been made to take account of the potential effects of neuroplasticity (Biswal et al., 2010; Rippon et al., 2014). This means that reports of alleged sex differences in the brain could continue to contribute to the canon of beliefs about the source of any kind of imbalance between the sexes.
Sex redefined Another more fundamental way of challenging the arguments about male and female brains is to stop searching for differences between two groups that actually turn out not to be separate groups at all.
There is emerging evidence that describing sex as a dichotomous and internally consistent category is flawed. Just thinking in terms of either male or female, XX or XY, ‘Mars or Venus’ is simplistic and not representative of the wider spectrum. This is claimed to be true even at the most fundamental biological level (Ainsworth, 2015) and, most recently, at the level of the brain itself. In a study based on the first whole-brain analyses of ‘male/female’ characteristics in structures and connections, based on over 1400 brains, it is claimed that there is no such thing as a ‘male’ or a ‘female’ brain. All brains, regardless of the biological sex of their owner, are a ‘mosaic’ of different characteristics (Joel et al., 2015) arising from a range of ‘brain altering’ experiences (Joel & Fausto-Sterling, 2016). Looking for differences between brains solely based on the sex of their owners will mask the true sources of variability.
This parallels a long-standing message of previous psychological research demonstrating that there is much greater similarity between the sexes, with greatly overlapping data distributions and tiny effect sizes, challenging long-standing certainties about ‘reliable’ differences between the sexes (Hyde, 2014). More particularly, it has been shown that in many categories of behaviour, cognition, personality and aptitudes that have been assumed to unfailingly distinguish men from women, there really are very few consistent differences between the sexes and that the patterns of such characteristics are more accurately grouped along a single dimension (Carothers & Reis, 2013; Reis & Carothers, 2014). This includes measures such as masculinity/femininity, empathy and science inclination. To paraphrase the title of an excellent paper on this very theme, we are none of us from Mars or Venus, we are all from Earth.
The claims and counter-claims about differences between two groups divided according to their biological sex could thus be dismissed as founded on a fundamental misconception about the very basis of the division. Understanding differences (a) where they genuinely exist and (b) where the differences appear to have negative consequences is clearly important; it is just that we might need to be more open-minded about where those differences came from and not focus solely on biological sex as their source.
A powerful position Gender inequality remains a matter of global concern, in both developed and emerging economies. In order to make full use of our human capital, we need a better understanding of why there are still individual differences in achievement and what we might do to address them. Social cognitive neuroscience now offers potential game-changers to alter our understanding of the role of the brain in any kind of imbalance between groups – in normal or abnormal behaviour, ability, aptitude or achievement. Stunning advances in brain-imaging techniques offer much more detailed and accurate understanding of the role that brain characteristics might play in generating and sustaining inequalities. But the techniques need to be responsibly harnessed and their findings reliably communicated if they are going to provide any kind of genuine insights. When comparing brains, we need to know more than just the sex of their owners, we need to know what kind of brain-altering experiences these owners have been through. And, most radical of all, cognitive neuroscientists have suggested that the very concept of differences between the sexes is not representative of the true state of affairs. Basing research efforts and social policy initiatives on two neat, distinct categories may well be misguided.
We are in a powerful position to challenge beliefs (spoken or unspoken) about the ‘essential’ unchangeability of the human brain and its role in determining gender inequality. It’s time to counter self-fulfilling prophecies of underperformance, to harness the plasticity of all brains and ensure they can break through glass ceilings.
Meet the author ‘Alongside my work on the more basic aspects of brain imaging, I have always been interested in what used to be called “biological politics” and has now morphed into “critical neuroscience”. A key focus was critiquing research into sex differences and social inequality and psychology’s contributions (positive and negative) to that debate. My main interests were in women’s mental health, and at that stage I was influenced by researchers such as Janet Sayers and Stephanie Shields.
‘In 2010 I was asked to review the contribution of newly emerging brain-imaging techniques to the concept of the male and the female brain. Exchanging ideas with colleagues such as Cordelia Fine and Rebecca Jordan-Young, it became clear that there were major problems in this field. There were too many examples of the sort of irresponsible reporting that characterises the neurotrash and neurononsense I’m writing about here. 21st-century gender stereotypes about what females and males can and can’t do seem to be more rigid and prescriptive than ever before, much enhanced by the power of many forms of media. Misunderstanding and misrepresentation of brain imaging findings feed into the kind of “blame the brain” beliefs that underpin many such stereotypes and stop people from achieving their potential (or even trying in the first place). Hopefully, this article will alert readers to some of the myths and misconceptions in the area and help them fight back against such negative thinking.’
Hello ladies an Gentlemen si please stay tuned as i welcome you with a reconciled show, on Proclamation.
Always working on Progressive Progression.
My heart is Always with the democracy, people’s first.
Im not a selfish man, your safety is paramount.
Im cheaper then the sun newspaper.
Im cheaper then the daily mail, or the daiky telegraph.
So give me some encouragement, show yout support, share an subscribe. Its positivity. It excels, it expressionless to subscribe to Proclamation News and Gatherence’s.
An enthusiastic episode.
It’s characteristics
It’s emphasizes
It’s characterised
It’s UK road users safe guided abilitations. An to show respect for legal authorities. The law divides the law multiples.
It’s becoming very essential to subscribe an share it’s content of Proclamation News and Gatherence.
It’s vocal it’s extraordinary.
I’m an independent operator, a human safe gaurded navigator, I’m like a Independent superman a RoboCop like minded UK road user instigator.
We are cheaper than the Daily mail.
It’s free to air..
So stay tuned in:
Todays modern society we take a look at UK roads.
Safety within the infrastructure.
So think first think safety.
Do not enter your car under the influence of alcohol
Do not enter the car under influence of narcotics
Do not enter the car under sleep deprivation
Making sure you an the passengers on board have seat safety belts on an babies have seat belt adapter adjacent to the car seat.
Check engine coolant tank an engine oil are filled up to the maximum level.
Check tryes for psi limits before take of, an also trye treads an the tryes are no bold.
Look out for road safety signs.
An further road police safety signs
Check both your wing mirrors an centre mirror before acting an turning into another direction or over taking making sure pedestrians an motorcycle are not over taking.
Plan your destination.
Its the UK road guidelines, to give you some acknowledgement of road congestions, roadworks an car accidents.
Soit’s very benificail to subscribe show your support give me some encouragement, an share to keep not only me but others safety within the UK road.
Please call 999 or 101 for emergency an legal authorities assistance.
But please have some Forbearance as our police are very busy day to day.
With racketeering, theft an many other road incidents.
Our Firebirgade are busy with many fires, office, fields etc
an giving our children at school the P.A.T. down talk to our children at school, fireman Sam says do not play with fires or matches
An our NHS are very busy with many elder patients hip operations, heart an disease, cancer an may people have trip slips or falls at work. .
Did you no the most deaths at work are caused by slips trips or falls at work.
Think safety think first
Tragic accidents today.
Horror crash’ between car and bus leaves two critical
By Freya Noble – 5 hours ago
A number of people are in a critical condition after a bus and car crashed in wet conditions in Sydney’s west.
Just after 11am today 11 ambulance crews including a specialised medical team and a helicopter were called to the scene of the accident on Memorial Avenue in Liverpool.
A woman, believed to be in her 50s, and a 13-year-old girl who were in the car were rushed to hospital in a critical condition. The male driver, also believed to be in his 50s, is stable.
A boy, 14, and a woman, believed to be in her 60s, who were travelling on the bus were also injured. The teenager was taken to Westmead Hospital and the woman to Liverpool Hospital.
They are both stable.
“This is a horror crash on our wet roads today, with multiple patients in critical conditions,” Inspector John Brotherhood, Duty Operations Manager NSW Ambulance said.
It was mayhem when paramedics arrived on scene. “These wet conditions on our roads are unprecedented and have the potential to be life-threatening. “It takes one single thing to go wrong and your vehicle can become a weapon. Look after each other in these conditions.”
Proclamation news an Gatherence 📰 cant be beat for flux news daily, its spread, an its broadsheet news article. LPD responds to three car crash near Adams and N. 46th StreetLINCOLN, Neb. (KOLN) – Lincoln police responded to a crash near Adams and N. 46th Street on Friday. The incident occurred at around 6:23 p.m. According to officials, three cars were involved in the crash. At least one person had to be extricated. Five people were taken to the hospital, though the current extent of their injuries is unknown. Officials had to call for additional ambulances and the extrication tools. LPD said the road near N. 46th and Adams will be closed for several hours. This incident is still currently under investigation. This story will be updated as more information becomes available.
Thats Proclamation with two major car incidents buckle up this month, ita going to be a ride.
Now its time for Proclamation inside Westminster abbey.
Jeremy Corbyn to snub Labour inquiry into disastrous election defeat Exclusive: Damning report expected
I like Labour leader Jeremy corbyn, hes like marmite, you either love him or or you hate him. He was mp of north london when i was born. But ironically he talks absolute nonsense.
Jeremy Corbyn is to snub a formal inquest into Labour’s disastrous performance in the general election.
Headed up by former leader Ed Miliband, the inquiry is expected to report that Labour was hopelessly outmatched by the Tories in its digital campaign, while activists on the ground were repeatedly confronted with concern about Mr Corbyn, insiders said.
Its looking to be an horrific bleak week for labour party ahead of Proclamation New An Gatherence showdown this week. Labour shadow minister Jon Ashworth in ‘end of the party’ warning
I mean who is running labour party captain ironic, its a total shambolic episode a catastrophic episode.
Labour’s “devastating” general election defeat could spell the end of the party, shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth has warned.
The Labour MP told a BBC Radio 4 documentary the party had to change or face up to 15 years out of power.
“Unless we do something quick this could be the end of the Labour Party in this country”, he said.
Senior Labour and Tory figures give frank assessments of the 2019 campaign in the programme to be aired on Sunday.
Labour went down to its worst defeat, in terms of seats, since 1935, although its vote share was slightly higher than when it lost in 2010 and 2015.
Mr Ashworth had to apologise to his party two days before the election, after saying he did not believe it could win, blaming “the combination of Corbyn and Brexit”.
‘Voters didn’t buy it’
He said he was “set up” by a Tory friend, who secretly recorded his comments and released them to the media.
“I obviously regret that and I still think about it all time,” he told The Inside Story of Election 19 documentary.
But he added: “I was correct – that was the irony of the phone call.”
The Leicester South MP is critical of Labour’s decision to focus on claims the Conservatives were plotting to put the NHS on the table in trade talks with America.
“It was a legitimate point to make, but I think, politically, voters didn’t buy it,” he said, because it did not directly affect their lives.
He also claims there was a lack of communication and planning at the heart of Labour’s campaign.
He said he was told about the party’s free broadband pledge by a BBC Newsnight producer while he was waiting to go on air to talk about Labour’s NHS policies.
“I knew nothing about it,” he said, adding that it “was a week when we were trying to focus on the NHS and we were suddenly going off in another direction”.
‘A Brexit election’
He added that he did not think Labour should assume it would automatically return to power – and it needed to change.
“We could be out for another five to 10, 15 years,” he said.
Jeremy Corbyn’s former director of communications, James Schneider, also highlights a lack of trust between the key players in the campaign.
“John (McDonnell) and his shadow Treasury team did guard quite closely their big announcements,” he told presenter Anne McElvoy.
“Over the course of 2019, and the disagreements on Brexit, the levels of trust within the operation had reduced very much and there was some operational scratchiness.”
‘Cut through’
He said Labour’s campaign slogan “it’s time for real change” never “took off”, adding “we never filled it in with content or with other meaning”, giving the impression that the party was “throwing things at the wall”.
The Conservatives honed their social media messages during the campaign before unleashing a barrage of “negative, nasty messages about Jeremy” in the final days, says Mr Schneider.
Isaac Levido, the Australian strategist who ran the Conservative campaign, said he had no regrets about any of the party’s messages.
He describes a much-criticised social media video, edited to show Sir Keir Starmer apparently unable to answer a question on Labour’s Brexit position, as “a little bit of fun”.
“From time to time you need to do things that cut through,” he added.
‘We won’
He also revealed that he had tried to maintain morale at Tory HQ by playing music, including One Day More, from the musical Les Miserables, on the eve of polling day.
“I think there was a bit of a sing-a-long. People were quite delirious by that point,” he added.
Cabinet Minister Michael Gove is asked if it was a mistake for Boris Johnson not to be interviewed by the BBC’s Andrew Neil.
“No, because we won,” he replied.
“I’m sure Boris would have done brilliantly, but with the best will in the world and I am huge fan of Andrew Neil, the purpose of running an election campaign is to win so that you can govern the country well, not to agree to every broadcast bid’.
Lib Dem leadership contender Layla Moran said her party failed to properly explain its policy of cancelling Brexit if it won the election.
“It made us look arrogant, and it made us look stupid,” she says.
Once their broadband is installed and they’ve paid their first bill, we’ll email you both a £50 Amazon.co.uk Gift Card within 30 days.
Broadband deals
Save £240 on Superfast Fibre 2. That’s an exclusive online price, and our biggest ever saving on fibre broadband.
Superfast Fibre Essential 36 Mb
Average speed Everyday browsing and streaming on one or two devices at once Online exclusive price £24.99Δ a month
24 month contract, then £32.99 a month
£19.99 upfront
Superfast Fibre + BT Sport App 50 Mb
Average speed Get all the unmissable action on BT Sport along with speedy BT broadband. Get an Xbox bundle worth £449 on us £45.99Δ a month
24 month contract, then £53.99 a month
£9.99 P&P
Check with a BT GURU online, or call there hotline for bigger better deals, its proclamation news and gatherence, with professor johnson its good to talk.
It’s UK road users safe guided abilitations. An to show respect for legal authorities. The law divides the law multiples.
It’s becoming very essential to subscribe an share it’s content of Proclamation News and Gatherence.
It’s vocal it’s extraordinary.
I’m an independent operator, a human safe guarded navigator, I’m like a Independent superman a RoboCop like minded UK road user instigator.
We are cheaper than the Daily mail.
It’s free to air..
So stay tuned in:
Todays modern society we take a look at UK roads.
Safety within the infrastructure.
So think first think safety.
Do not enter your car under the influence of alcohol
Do not enter the car under influence of narcotics
Do not enter the car under sleep deprivation
Making sure you an the passengers on board have seat safety belts on an babies have seat belt adapter adjacent to the car seat.
Check engine coolant tank an engine oil are filled up to the maximum level.
Check tryes for psi limits before take of, an also trye treads an the tryes are no bold.
Look out for road safety signs.
An further road police safety signs
Check both your wing mirrors an centre mirror before acting an turning into another direction or over taking making sure pedestrians an motorcycle are not over taking.
Plan your destination.
Its the UK road guidelines, to give you some acknowledgement of road congestion’s, roadworks an car accidents.
So it’s very beneficial to subscribe show your support give me some encouragement, an share to keep not only me but others safety within the UK road.
Please call 999 or 101 for emergency an legal authorities assistance.
But please have some Forbearance as our police are very busy day to day.
With racketeering, theft an many other road incidents.
Our Firebirgade are busy with many fires, office, fields etc
an giving our children at school the P.A.T. down talk to our children at school, fireman Sam says do not play with fires or matches
An our NHS are very busy with many elder patients hip operations, heart an disease, cancer an may people have trip slips or falls at work. .
Did you no the most deaths at work are caused by slips trips or falls at work.
Think safety think first
Holland on sea.
Grenfell Avenue Gas Main Work, temporary Traffic Signals Temporary traffic signals due to gas main work on Grenfell Avenue near Park Boulevard. 29 Jan 2020, 12:32PM (first reporte
Bramford Ipswich
Sproughton RoadRoad closed, constructionRoad closed due to construction on Sproughton Road both ways from Europa Way to A14 J54 (Sproughton).19 Jan 2020, 8:02AM (first reported
Brightlingsea
B1029Gas Main Work, temporary Traffic SignalsTemporary traffic signals due to gas main work on B1029 Station Road near ‘The Railway Tavern’ pub.29 Jan 2020, 12:47PM (first reported)
Boris Johnson’s father spoke to Chinese ambassador about coronavirus
Chinese officials were “concerned” Boris Johnson did not send a personal message of support after the coronavirus outbreak, emails suggest.
The PM’s father, Stanley Johnson, met Chinese ambassador Liu Xiaoming and emailed his worries to UK officials – accidentally copying in the BBC.
Mr Liu told him the prime minister had not yet directly contacted the Chinese.
A government spokesman said the UK had been in close contact with the Chinese authorities since the outbreak.
Sources also stressed Stanley Johnson was not acting on behalf or at the request of the British government.
Stanley Johnson held a 90-minute meeting with Mr Liu on Tuesday.
Mr Johnson, a longstanding environmental campaigner, was invited to the Chinese embassy to discuss summits on the topic, due to take place this autumn in China and the UK.
Shortly after the meeting, the PM’s father used his personal email address to share an account of the discussion with the environment minister Lord Goldsmith and other UK officials.
He wrote: “Re the outbreak of coronavirus, Mr Liu obviously was concerned that there had not yet – so he asserted – been direct contact between the PM and Chinese head of state or government in terms of a personal message or telephone call.”
‘Extremely useful’
Stanley Johnson also revealed he had raised the possibility of his son visiting China in October to attend an international conference on biodiversity, COP15, which will be held in Kunming.
Lord Goldsmith wrote a reply from his personal email address, saying: “Thank you so much Stanley. That is extremely useful.”
Lord Goldsmith wrote a reply from his personal email address, saying: “Thank you so much Stanley. That is extremely useful.”
No one in the exchange appeared to have noticed the BBC was copied in until it was raised with them.
After being informed of his mistake, Mr Johnson said: “I was copying in someone who happened to have the same name as a lady at the BBC. These things happen.”
Mr Liu shared pictures of him and Stanley Johnson on Twitter, saying they had met to exchange views on the COP15 meeting and the COP26 meeting on climate change, to be hosted in Glasgow.
He added: “These two conferences are great opportunities to promote international cooperation on environmental protection & climate change
The World Health Organization says the coronavirus, which has spread to more than 20 countries, including the UK, does not yet qualify as a “pandemic”.
But the UK government is recommending that British citizens in China sleave the country to minimise exposure to it.
At a press conference in London, Mr Liu warned against “panic” and “over-reaction”.
He added: “We would advise the British side to take the advice of the WHO… They [the UK government] recognise the effectiveness of the measures taken by China. They also tell us they will follow the WHO’s advice.”
Mr Liu also said the UK government’s words were “not entirely square” with the facts and that it should take an “objective, cool-headed view of what is happening”.
The “channel of communication” between the Chinese and UK governments remained “very open”, he added.
A UK government spokesman said: “The government has been in close contact with the Chinese authorities since the start of the outbreak.”
The foreign secretary and national security adviser had spoken to their counterparts in the past week, the spokesman added.
“The UK has provided medical supplies to help China tackle the outbreak and together we have facilitated the repatriation of British nationals and their dependants from Wuhan,” he said.
Johnson criticised by watchdog over universal credit claim
Boris Johnson has been rebuked by the independent statistics watchdog over claims he made last month about universal credit.
The prime minister told MPs the welfare change, which rolls six benefits into one payment, had already succeeded in getting 200,000 people into work.
But the UK Statistics Authority said the number was only an estimate for when the change is fully rolled out.
The much-delayed system is now due to be fully rolled out in September 2024.
The watchdog had been asked to investigate the 200,000 jobs figure by Labour’s shadow work and pensions secretary Margaret Greenwood.
Mr Johnson had used it to defend government welfare changes during an exchange with Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn at Prime Minister’s Questions.
In a letter to the prime minister, the watchdog’s chairman Sir David Norgrove confirmed the figure was an estimate, rather than for “the effect so far”.
The jobs figure, estimated to be achieved by 2024/25, was made by the Department for Work and Pensions in its 2018 business case for universal credit.
It has already been questioned by the National Audit Office, which concluded the department would “never be able to measure” the impact on employment.
“It cannot isolate the effect of universal credit from other economic factors in increasing employment,” the NAO concluded in a 2018 review.
This is not the first time the chairman of the UK Statistics Authority has clashed with Mr Johnson over his use of statistics.
In 2017, Sir David criticised him for his claims during the EU referendum campaign that Brexit would save the UK £350m a week.
He added that the figure, used by Mr Johnson whilst he was foreign secretary, constituted a “clear misuse of official statistics”
.Former Speaker John Bercow naming staff in book unacceptable – Commons
The House of Commons has accused John Bercow of naming ex-staff in his autobiography without their permission, saying this was “unacceptable”.
In his book, Unspeakable, the former Commons Speaker hits back at accusations of bullying made against him by individual staff members.
A Commons spokesperson said employees had a “right to expect” privacy.
But Mr Bercow said he was responding to critics who had tried to “blacken” his name by making “unfounded claims”.
He quit as Speaker in October after more than 10 years in the role.
Some of Mr Bercow’s ex-colleagues have gone public with complaints against him in the past.
The Commons has not named the employees it is concerned about.
A spokesperson said: “House of Commons staff work incredibly hard to enable the effective functioning of our democracy and have a right to expect that their privacy be respected. It is unacceptable to publicly name current or former staff without their prior knowledge or authority, especially for the purpose of financial gain or commercial success.
“A crucial element of the work of House of Commons staff is to provide confidential, impartial advice to MPs. Breaking this confidentiality undermines this important principle and also places staff in a position from which they are unable to respond.”
In a statement, Mr Bercow’s agent said: “Given there is a small but highly vocal group of people consistently seeking to blacken his name, it would be odd if Mr Bercow did not comment on their unfounded allegations and the reasons behind them.
“He was advised by Speaker’s Counsel not to do so in detail while he was in office. He is therefore doing so now. If the book had not addressed these issues, he would rightly have been accused of serious omission.
“Critics are entitled to air their views. What they are not entitled to do is to make unfounded allegations and expect Mr Bercow to say nothing in return.”
Following Mr Bercow’s comments, a Commons spokesperson said: “In his book, Mr Bercow has chosen to name a number of staff who have never spoken publicly about their experiences or sought to gain publicity as a result.
“We condemn this behaviour and stand by our previous statement on the matter.”
Earlier this week, Mr Bercow confirmed that he had been proposed for a peerage by outgoing Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.
But he has suggested Downing Street is seeking to block his appointment to Parliament’s upper chamber.
As I visualise the historical architecture self portrait of Queen Elizabeth 1st which was allocated in 1580’s as we discover she was 30 at years 1563, so therefore my algebra calculations from 1563 to 1580 would make the portrait of her being 47 years of age!
Which is twenty two years before Elizabeth first died march 24th 1603 at the age of sixty nine, an after her reign of forty five years of age. So you can visualise the significance of the assignment figure the ageing maturity between this focused figure a bit more adequately within her younger portraits of 1558. This signalises almost facts within its description, of its reality time scale.
Again the focused the focused Virgin Queen opposes to appear by herself in the portrait. This to me shows a personality of self maintained she seems to engage a lot via mindfulness. Finding that she possibly developed her own thoughts and personality to help her be in control whilst at the reign of her British empire, an also not letting a king gate-crashing her influences an spoiling her equities, within her virginity an literature.
The portrait itself which allocates her within quit possible after the time zone of the victorious battle of the Armada when the Spanish fleet tried to invade the British empire. As she seems appears to her standing Inside her palace. Her feminity shows also grasping onto a feather duster, an a small like puppy dog, an in front of her lies an Excalibur of victory an honour. On the wall behind her shows a symbol of victorious dragons surrounding a shield. Also the people in the background appear to be coming into the palace, quit possibly a victorious gathering or celebrations as the Queen an her fleet become victorious in the battle of Armada.
The portrait an further studies emasculates an image of the powerful Monarchy as we know today as Queen Elizabeth 1st. The Virgin Queen, who ruled her people justly, she is often seen as one of the most successful monarchs of England.
In the figure description shows her in a corset type dress which shows her broad shoulders an her elegant waist. Her pearls on her crown shows her virginity symbol!. As we now discover this reputation just by an image. It’s era, imagine the evidence to a judiciary reports?
To find out who or what it was in aid off?
With only a figure of a queen a few people which like in the background a dog, an Excalibur.
Here shows I really used my compressive an optimistic attitude to look beyond the lines of the photographs
Evidence. I looked at the dates an worked out the calculations of her age, then went from there for its discovery. I’m quit assure with pin point with accuracy it was her victorious defeat over Armada, she wasn’t at fault she was protecting her country, she was provoked by the attack, so therefore self defence.
My end summary:
I started looking at the portrait thinking there is no start or end of how I’d go about taking this within a story. How can I possibly come up with a strategy or even a formation to its story. It’s really amazing such a simple figure or photo tells a storyline
Wednesday 5th February 2020
Proclamation news an Gatherence
Ive posted my initial assignment today, to open University.
I found references detailed to its description.
The era, its constituency (geography) where abouts, who was the focus on.
Cassius Dio really excels Cleopatra’s prestige prescription here in the extract, stating she was a woman, a lady of pure elegance an beauty. He also suggested when she was at her prime of her youth.
This is a significance? To almost detail within her age, as a prime age we know is 25 years of age.
I know she was Queen of Egypt at 18 years of age 51 bc so therefore 44bc years in her Prime Exotic years of youth, she had a pursavive voice that struck everyone, her knowledge an wisdom give her fleet acknowledgement that she was in control over her power and beauty.
The Extract itself was scriptured by Cassius Dio (1916) A Roman historian.
Then Translated by Earnest Cary. In the Loeb Classical Library London: Harvard University Press, vol 4. Pp. 169-70. As previously discovered in Unit 1.
Ive found some similarities with Cassius Dio’s an how hes then depicted Cleopatra’s description over her winning devotion over julius Caesar.
In 4.1 Cleopatra in Hollywood she shows passion towards Julius Caesar, in this film you can see her entice him with bare minimum clothes on, which excels her slim tender skin, barely clothed body. In this era she played Theda Bara 1917.
The name Theda Bara (Ancient death) she wore bare minimal clothes a head garment a python crown. With minimal clothes with only flesh on show.
Cleopatra’s cunning plan was to embrace a complete sexuality to deploy her empowerment, over the like of Julius Caesar,
My thoughts? Why Cassius Dio depicted Cleopatra for my assignment l?
She was a phenomenal ironic Queen of Egypt
Ironic with pure sexuality empowerment an her ‘tongue in cheek’ ethical speech which gave her the edge as the queen of Egypt.
As we read through the extract we discover Cassius Dio the narrator is a historiographical traditional writer with its roots of propoganda.
Cleopatra through the Romans eyes, writing which was about 250 years later, said how did cassius Dio know Excatly what Augustus say in his speech? An did Augustus have a historian with good shorthand travelling alingside him?
As his explanation is almost certainly that Cassius Dio made up the speech himself. So it may now seem a travesty of what history is sopposed to be, but this sort of imaginative and intentive colouring of the past was unusual in the writing of ancient history.
Im now adjourning some of the similarities to the significance in relations to Cassius Dio description of Cleopatra an to showcase my case studies. It will match up to the storyline within the extract!
So looking back th through unit 1
4.2 Cleopatra on tv. She appears in a film sienna warrior Princess via a roll of carpet, it was worked into a form of erotic bondage, an its how she become her female empowerment seductively Cleopatra AK sienna where she stages submissions why employing her sexualities take control. She later seduces Caeser by a welcone suggestion. “Im Cleopatra Queen of egypt slave of rome”! During the 1990’s an beyond into the new Millennium Cleopatra story begins to the gretaer fragrance of sexualities an it wasnt a matter of sex.
It was more of a dated Politics Narrative.
Cleopatra didnt have to be judged by a male prespective , it couldve becone shameless, rather she could embraced by a potent icon, a female ruler ambassador with such elegance.
There is no evidence of Cleopatra if shes white or black. Theres no evidence if she had Macedonian blood through her mums side, personally i think it leaves good culture debates for the different ethnicity to be clear of she was actually white ot black, it brings the different cultures together an power within its facinity of debates.
Me personally as a detective perspective i think her father being form Egypt an her mother Macedonian at the bare minimum half-cast that wouldve left cleopatra. However it wasnt pin pointed. It would’ve left a nice gleaming tanned skin tone. Her threaded hair gives the impression of a black featured hair style.
This leaves a total different multiple culture diversity. She become a nationalist hero standing upto the Romans.
Who was to blame for the cause of Julius Caesar death?
Was Cleopatra being a seductress over empowerment an greed, the cause of latter the assassination in 44bc
6 republicans sopposedly appeared at his death with multiple stab wounds to cesaers chest.
The assassination was when cleopatra was in her prime age of 25years of age.
Welcome welcome. We are inviting an interest of an amazing audience world wide.
Emasculating them to this erotic euphoria episode on Proclamation.
So make sure you tune in share an subscribe.
Each an every single day. Putting in not only tyranny speaking magnificent an both a significant prospective to its gatherings of safety guidelines.
But now also an added historical paternalistic episode to its throne, I’m proactive with our kingdom, I’m bringing the Victorians back throughout its victories episode at the realm.
Its aim is warrant more entries an subscription to this focused channel.
In doing such a drastic an dramatic septic emasculation, i intned to desire you with my marinated algebra of human population growth in abundance.
Its come to this, an exoticism a euphoria more of a opium classification.
But rather this highs an lows in life become more natural more satisfying with just only purrissity to the Bonified Conservatism sensation feeling, you get with only just, proclamation news an Gatherence
Think safety and think first.
Alcohol and narcotics are the worst sin, since you begun this sentence.
Think futuristic think futurism.
Think communism
Think populism
Now stop take a look elaborate and listen.
Without you it wouldnt be possible, an im a firm believer nothing is impossible.
Nothing is unapproachable,
I feel incredible like ive been anointed to maintain the dominion of the British publicans.
Its was my absolute honour to plesure you with my revolving desires to you the people, an our common people in the define elevated country.
/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-expressandstar-mna.s3.amazonaws.com/public/GKE4XWCJHFESXKKEILQV3T4UHE.jpg)
MP J Johnson 