Proclamation News an Gatherence

Parliament Staff Are No Longer Powerless Against Bullying By Our Most Powerful

The damage done by past abuse may never be fully repaired, but Parliament has just took a big step to end its rotten working culture, BBC Newsnight’s Lucinda Day writes.

When House of Commons staff first presented serious allegations of bullying and sexual harassment to Newsnight back in late 2017, they had little faith that the culture in their workplace – and the behaviour of a minority of problematic MPs – would ever change.

They recalled horror stories of sexual harassment and bullying endured by themselves and their colleagues by Members of Parliament. They consistently highlighted how, without a truly independent complaints procedure, they were the ones doomed to suffer further – both emotionally and professionally – if they raised their concerns around their experiences. Tuesday night marked a historic turning point in the quest of those staff to restore trust in the institution they loved working for, changing the culture of the House for generations to come. Two years on from our initial investigation, MPs finally voted to implement a truly independent process for handling allegations of bullying and sexual harassment. This new system, whereby an independent panel of experts will investigate complaints and determine sanctions, finally prevents MPs from exploiting their power and their parliamentary privilege to influence HR outcomes. It drags Parliament, as a workplace, into the 21st century. 

It’s been an emotionally exhausting, sometimes traumatic, and often demoralising journey for the apolitical staff who bravely came forward to achieve this outcome, and their efforts must now be commended – not questioned – by the MPs who pushed back against them for so long.

The culture of “deference, subservience, acquiescence and silence”, outlined by former High Court judge Dame Laura Cox in the wake of our reporting, will not change overnight. A mere five votes determined the outcome of Tuesday’s vote, signalling how both MPs and House management must continue to learn from the lessons of the past.Despite Dame Laura’s very clear assertions that a fully independent complaints procedure, free from the influence of MPs, was wholly necessary to protect the interests of staff, the past two years have seen many MPs either choosing to remain silent or throwing their energy into casting public doubt over the validity of certain allegations, rather than sorting out the rotten working culture to which a significant number of them contributed.

In the very worst cases, we found that the inadequate response to the staff who raised issues led to emotional breakdowns and departures from Parliament.

While some MPs were rightly outraged by our extensive reports of harassment and bullying that had, in some cases, ended the careers of talented staff, many made it clear that they were outraged on the contrary – that Members should face a “trial by media” for their alleged inappropriate behaviour. What those adopting this argument failed to grasp, however, was the extent to which the people who worked so diligently for them had lost all faith that their concerns would ever be taken seriously – and dealt with effectively – through internal processes. They came to Newsnight not for any limelight, but as a last resort.

While lacklustre HR processes lie at the heart of this story, so too do people. In the very worst cases, we found that the inadequate response to the staff who raised issues led to emotional breakdowns and departures from Parliament. The “best case” scenarios saw people moved from jobs they loved after complaints were made, as though they were the problem as opposed to the perpetrators. This not only undermined the morale of victims and staff, but the integrity of the institution and public trust in our parliamentarians more widely. 

During Tuesday’s vote, many feared their best efforts to ignite change would be fruitless, due to the inclusion of a government clause whereby MPs could debate cases of bullying and harassment in the House after the independent expert panel had investigated allegations and recommended sanctions. This, yet again, risked undermining the implementation of the independent process that Dame Laura cited as essential.

An amendment put forward by Labour’s Chris Bryant enabled MPs to vote in favour of a truly independent process that rejected the spectacle of MPs debating on cases. At last, Members of Parliament rightly judged that this would have humiliating consequences, and act as a deterrent for complainants, if it were adopted.

While the collateral damage caused to staff – past and present – along this laborious journey may never be fully repaired, MPs have now reclaimed their integrity by voting in favour of an independent complaints and grievances policy that is free from political interference, for all parliamentary staff. 

More importantly, those who have spoken out, time and again, both internally and externally, both publicly and from behind the scenes, can finally feel satisfied that future generations of parliamentary staff will not be powerless to prevent abuse by the powerful. 

That is something worth celebrating.

More on Populism within Proclamation News an Gatherence, subscribe to our cast, you can find us on YouTube, castbox.fm, even a small donation, I would really appreciate any support as I am providing you with magical news daily, with a friendly gentleman approach slight sophisticated. I’ve been studying media studies since 1995, now as we approach jornalism at its highest divine elevation. You can view our merchandise at https://www.etsy.com/uk/shop/ProcsArt

Or email us at proclamationnewsandgatherence@yahoo.com

IT didn’t take long for the first fatal stabbing to happen in the capital in the new year.

Sadly it appears that knife crime is still plaguing London as we move into 2020.

How many stabbings have there been in London this year?
January 3 – The first fatal stabbing of this year happened on January 3 after Uber Eats worker Takieddine “Taki”Boudhane was knifed to death near Finsbury Park, North London

January 3 – Police launched another murder probe after the remains of William Algar, 53, were found in Barnes. A post-mortem revealed the cause of death as a stab wound to the chest

January 13 – A Bulgarian man, Krasimir Kartikov, 60, was named as a victim found dead in Croydon. A post-mortem examination revealed he died of multiple injuries

January 19 – Three men, Harinder Kumar 22, Narinder Singh, 26, and Baljit Singh, 34, who were all members of the local Sikh community, were stabbed to death in Seven Kings, Ilford

January 24 –  The victim, believed to be a Polish national in his 60s, was found with stab injuries at an address on Mount Pleasant Lane, Clapton

January 27 – Louis Johnson, 16, was stabbed in front of shocked commuters during evening rush hour at East Croydon station in south east London

February 2 – Sudesh Amman, 20, was shot dead by police after stabbing two people in Streatham, South London

February 5 – A 19-year-old boy was stabbed in a knife fight on Kingsley Road in Hounslow, West London. Met Police confirmed a man, in his early 20s, and a 15-year-old boy, were arrested on suspicion of causing grievous bodily harm with intent

February 5 – The 16-year-old victim was rushed to hospital after being stabbed in broad daylight in upmarket Highgate

February 5 – A horrified dogwalker discovered 15-year-old Babacar ‘Babz’ Diagne stabbed to death on grassland in Coventry

London’s knife explosion has fuelled the capital’s highest murder rate in more than a decade with 149 people killed in the capital in 2019 – 90 in stabbing attacks.

Westminster was the worst blackspot with 212 arrests. The borough is also the worst in the country for knife attacks.

Ten people on average are caught with blades EVERY DAY on the streets of London.

Why is there so much violence in the capital?

One of the reasons why violence in the capital has spread is because of the brutal “county lines trade” where urban dealers force children and other vulnerable people to take drugs to customers in more rural areas.

The National Crime Agency estimate there are more than 1,000 “county lines” in operation – a 40 per cent rise in just one year – raking in an estimated £1.8billion annual profit.

Each county lines route is making as much as £5,000 a day – £7million between them all.

The county lines gangs regularly entice boys, largely from broken homes, into a life of crime with promises of money, kudos and a sense of belonging often lacking in their troubled home lives.

In London itself, gang warfare is increasingly being driven by a ruthless battle to control the drugs market in a move away from “postcode wars”.

Middle class cocaine users have come under fire for helping to fuel this increasingly violent battle in Lawless London.

Cressida Dick, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, said the growing demand from well-off users for the Class A drug was leading to a surge in violent gang crime.

You can also follow our YouTube channel and subscribe

Front Bench Politics.

BACK TO SCHOOL 

Kids should get 3 weeks in classrooms under 1m rule BEFORE summer, ex-education secretary demands

‘The kids need this, slacking education, many parents across the UK are not academically fixed, or have the facultys to educate there children. So it’s a great plan off action’.

Writer/Editor/Creator/J. Johnson.

Lord Blunkett joined calls by MPs on the Government to cut the 2 metre rule in schools and bring back plans for all kids to spend time in the classroom before the break.Lord Bunkett told Proclamation News an Gatherence it was “imperative that every effort was made” and demanded the PM stop treating kids’ schooling like a “secondary issue”.

He said: “If we could get three weeks of education before the break, that would be a major plus and it would restore confidence across the board that there is real intent to do this.”

He suggested “neighbouring premises” and additional buildings such as libraries and other council owned buildings and outdoor ares could be used to help schools get more children into class.

His calls echoed Chair of the Education Select Committee Robert Halfon who last week told The Sun the rule should be cut in schools, given the lower risk of children transmitting the disease.

He said: “I hope we do it soon (cut he 2 metre rule in schools). Email us @ proclamationnewsandgatherence@yahoo.com if you have any queries of the kids going back to school.

Be polite courteous don’t over talk the judge.

You would like the following order;

Section 7 to establish kids wishes and feelings.
Drugs testing too
50/50 shared care as an outcome ideally.
They are being emotionally abused and you have video evidence of the boyfriend etc.

You have tried for a long time to ask social care for support this has been ignored including safeguarding concerns.

One child does not reside with the respondent and you feel basic care needs are failed.

Friday 19th June 2020

Proclamation News an Gatherence

D-day has arrived.

There’s not enough compassion for Alienation, so many alienated Parents take there own Life’s.

I shall support this today.

There should be impressioment for the opposing parent for stopping it from happening period…

#Alienationparents

Support suicide.

Philosophy is a way of thinking about the world, the universe, and society. It works by asking very basic questions about the nature of human thought, the nature of the universe, and the connections between them. The ideas in philosophy are often general and abstract.

Philosophy vs Compassion.

compassion. If someone shows kindness, caring, and a willingness to help others, they’re showing compassion. This is a word for a very positive emotion that has to do with being thoughtful and decent. … When you have compassion, you’re putting yourself in someone else’s shoes and really feeling for them.

Daniel Kinahan: Questions over Fury-Joshua fight promoter’s ‘drug gang links’

By Shane HarrisonBBC NI Dublin correspondent

• 11 June 2020

• Share this with Facebook
• Share this with Messenger
• Share this with Twitter
• Share this with Email
• Share

Irish PM Leo Varadkar has said he is “taken aback” that a man linked to one of the most prominent drugs gangs in Europe was thanked for helping to set up a major heavyweight boxing clash.

Tyson Fury thanked Daniel Kinahan for brokering a deal that would allow him to fight Anthony Joshua in 2021 – as long as he defeats Deontay Wilder.

Daniel Kinahan has no convictions.

But has been named in court by a judge as a senior figure in Irish organised crime.

Mr Varadkar told parliament he was “taken aback” by Fury’s comments given that they referred to someone with a “chequered history”.

He confirmed there had been contact on the matter between the Irish Department for Foreign Affairs and the UAE – where it has been suggested the bout could be held.

His government would raise the issue with broadcasters intending to air the event, added Mr Varadkar.

Biggest fight?

Joshua, 30, holds the WBA, IBF and WBO belts, while 31-year-old Fury is the WBC champion.

Talks over a historic bout for the undisputed title began in early May.

In an Instagram video posted on Wednesday, Fury said the clash was going ahead, offering “a big shout-out… to Dan” for his efforts.

“I’m just after getting off the phone with Daniel Kinahan,” said the boxer.

“He’s just informed me that the biggest fight in British boxing history has just been agreed.”

The development is widely seen in Ireland as the latest example of Daniel Kinahan attempting to launder his reputation in the UK and internationally.

The Criminal Assets Bureau – part of the Irish police, the Garda Síochána – has said he “controlled and managed” the operations of the family crime syndicate and “has associations that facilitate international criminal activity in Europe, Asia, the Middle East and South America”.

In November 2019, Europol identified the gang linked to Mr Kinahan as one of the main cocaine importers in Europe, adding that it now smuggled its surplus supplies to countries as far away as Australia.

The Irish Daily Star tabloid has said it will refuse to publicise the fights, which are expected to generate huge money and interest if all the details can be finalised.

In an editorial on Thursday, the paper said: “The fact that (Daniel Kinahan) has been hailed as some sort of saviour of boxing is not only a sad indictment of the sport but an insult to the thousands of lives he has helped ruin.”

Media coverage in Ireland to Kinahan and the proposed fights is very different from that across the Irish Sea, where Mr Kinahan is merely described by some as “a controversial figure”.

‘Murder, drugs and intimidation’

Daniel Kinahan first came to widespread public attention in Ireland in February 2016 when gunmen attacked the weigh-in at a boxing bout that resulted in the murder of a man described as a leader of the Kinahan crime cartel in Ireland.

The immediate aftermath of the shooting as spectators fled in fear was caught on camera and the footage went around the world.

It is believed he was the intended target.

The murder was part of a feud that has claimed at least 18 lives.

Politicians, police officers and the public in Ireland are keen that the outside world get to know what they call the real Daniel Kinahan.

Saturday 6th june 2020.

Prodigious Prominent Professor Johnson 05/09/1983

Alienated Parents should Know of, The children’s welfare:

Meaning of “parental responsibility”.

(1)In this Act “parental responsibility” means all the rights, duties, powers, responsibilities and authority which by law a parent of a child has in relation to the child and his property.

(2)It also includes the rights, powers and duties which a guardian of the child’s estate (appointed, before the commencement of section 5, to act generally) would have had in relation to the child and his property.

(3)The rights referred to in subsection (2) include, in particular, the right of the guardian to receive or recover in his own name, for the benefit of the child, property of whatever description and wherever situated which the child is entitled to receive or recover.

(4)The fact that a person has, or does not have, parental responsibility for a child shall not affect—

(a)any obligation which he may have in relation to the child (such as a statutory duty to maintain the child); or

(b)any rights which, in the event of the child’s death, he (or any other person) may have in relation to the child’s property.

(5)A person who—

(a)does not have parental responsibility for a particular child; but

(b)has care of the child,

may (subject to the provisions of this Act) do what is reasonable in all the circumstances of the case for the purpose of safeguarding or promoting the child’s welfare.

• 

Acquisition of parental responsibility by father.

(1)Where a child’s father and mother were not married to [F1, or civil partners of,] each other at the time of his birth [F2, the father shall acquire parental responsibility for the child if—

(a)he becomes registered as the child’s father under any of the enactments specified in subsection (1A);

(b)he and the child’s mother make an agreement (a “parental responsibility agreement”) providing for him to have parental responsibility for the child; or

(c)the court, on his application, orders that he shall have parental responsibility for the child.]

[F3(1A)The enactments referred to in subsection (1)(a) are—

(a)paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of section 10(1) and of section 10A(1) of the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953;

(b)paragraphs (a), (b)(i) and (c) of section 18(1), and sections 18(2)(b) and 20(1)(a) of the Registration of Births, Deaths and Marriages (Scotland) Act 1965; and

(c)sub-paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of Article 14(3) of the Births and Deaths Registration (Northern Ireland) Order 1976.

(1B)The [F4Secretary of State] may by order amend subsection (1A) so as to add further enactments to the list in that subsection.]

(2)No parental responsibility agreement shall have effect for the purposes of this Act unless—

(a)it is made in the form prescribed by regulations made by the Lord Chancellor; and

(b)where regulations are made by the Lord Chancellor prescribing the manner in which such agreements must be recorded, it is recorded in the prescribed manner.

“For advice seeking an absolute parent ask court for a section 8 (JJ)”

Child arrangements orders] and other orders with respect to children.

(1)In this Act —

• “[F2child arrangements order” means an order regulating arrangements relating to any of the following—(a)with whom a child is to live, spend time or otherwise have contact, and(b)when a child is to live, spend time or otherwise have contact with any person;]
• F3…
• “a prohibited steps order” means an order that no step which could be taken by a parent in meeting his parental responsibility for a child, and which is of a kind specified in the order, shall be taken by any person without the consent of the court;
• F3…
• “a specific issue order” means an order giving directions for the purpose of determining a specific question which has arisen, or which may arise, in connection with any aspect of parental responsibility for a child.

(2)In this Act “a section 8 order” means any of the orders mentioned in subsection (1) and any order varying or discharging such an order.

(3)For the purposes of this Act “family proceedings” means any proceedings—

(a)under the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court in relation to children; and

(b)under the enactments mentioned in subsection (4),

but does not include proceedings on an application for leave under section 100(3).

(4)The enactments are—

(a)Parts I, II and IV of this Act;

(b)the M1Matrimonial Causes Act 1973;

[F4(ba)Schedule 5 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004;]

[F5(c)the M2 Domestic Violence and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1976;

(d)the Adoption and Children Act 2002;]

(e)the M3Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates’ Courts Act 1978;

[F6(ea)Schedule 6 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004;]

[F5(f)sections 1 and 9 of the M4 Matrimonial Homes Act 1983; ]

(g)Part III of the M5Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984.

F7 [( h )the Family Law Act 1996]

[F8(i)sections 11 and 12 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.]

[F9(j)Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 (other than paragraph 3 of that Schedule).]

Restrictions on making section 8 orders.

(1)No court shall make any section 8 order, other than a [F1child arrangements order to which subsection (6B) applies], with respect to a child who is in the care of a local authority.

(2)No application may be made by a local authority for a [F2child arrangements] order and no court shall make such an order in favour of a local authority.

(3)A person who is, or was at any time within the last six months, a local authority foster parent of a child may not apply for leave to apply for a section 8 order with respect to the child unless—

(a)he has the consent of the authority;

(b)he is a relative of the child; or

(c)the child has lived with him for at least [F3one year] preceding the application.

(4)F4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(5)No court shall exercise its powers to make a specific issue order or prohibited steps order—

(a)with a view to achieving a result which could be achieved by making a [F5child arrangements] order [F6 or an order under section 51A of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (post-adoption contact)]; or

(b)in any way which is denied to the High Court (by section 100(2)) in the exercise of its inherent jurisdiction with respect to children.

(6)[F7No court shall make a [F8section 8] order ] which will end after the child has reached the age of sixteen unless it is satisfied that the circumstances of the case are exceptional.

[F9(6A)Subsection (6) does not apply to a child arrangements order to which subsection (6B) applies.

(6B)This subsection applies to a child arrangements order if the arrangements regulated by the order relate only to either or both of the following—

(a)with whom the child concerned is to live, and

(b)when the child is to live with any person.]

(7)No court shall make any section 8 order, other than one varying or discharging such an order, with respect to a child who has reached the age of sixteen unless it is satisfied that the circumstances of the case are exceptional.

Power of court to make section 8 orders.

(1)In any family proceedings in which a question arises with respect to the welfare of any child, the court may make a section 8 order with respect to the child if—

(a)an application for the order has been made by a person who—

(i)is entitled to apply for a section 8 order with respect to the child; or

(ii)has obtained the leave of the court to make the application; or

(b)the court considers that the order should be made even though no such application has been made.

(2)The court may also make a section 8 order with respect to any child on the application of a person who—

(a)is entitled to apply for a section 8 order with respect to the child; or

(b)has obtained the leave of the court to make the application.

(3)This section is subject to the restrictions imposed by section 9.

(4)The following persons are entitled to apply to the court for any section 8 order with respect to a child—

(a)any parent [F1, guardian or special guardian] of the child;

[F2(aa)any person who by virtue of section 4A has parental responsibility for the child;]

[F3(b)any person who is named, in a child arrangements order that is in force with respect to the child, as a person with whom the child is to live.]

(5)The following persons are entitled to apply for a [F4child arrangements] order with respect to a child—

(a)any party to a marriage (whether or not subsisting) in relation to whom the child is a child of the family;

[F5(aa)any civil partner in a civil partnership (whether or not subsisting) in relation to whom the child is a child of the family;]

(b)any person with whom the child has lived for a period of at least three years;

(c)any person who—

[F6(i)in any case where a child arrangements order in force with respect to the child regulates arrangements relating to with whom the child is to live or when the child is to live with any person, has the consent of each of the persons named in the order as a person with whom the child is to live;]

(ii)in any case where the child is in the care of a local authority, has the consent of that authority; or

(iii)in any other case, has the consent of each of those (if any) who have parental responsibility for the child.

[F7(d)any person who has parental responsibility for the child by virtue of provision made under section 12(2A).]

[F8(5A)A local authority foster parent is entitled to apply for a [F9child arrangements order to which subsection (5C) applies ] with respect to a child if the child has lived with him for a period of at least one year immediately preceding the application.]

[F10(5B)A relative of a child is entitled to apply for a [F11child arrangements order to which subsection (5C) applies ] with respect to the child if the child has lived with the relative for a period of at least one year immediately preceding the application.]

[F12(5C)This subsection applies to a child arrangements order if the arrangements regulated by the order relate only to either or both of the following—

(a)with whom the child concerned is to live, and

(b)when the child is to live with any person.]

(6)A person who would not otherwise be entitled (under the previous provisions of this section) to apply for the variation or discharge of a section 8 order shall be entitled to do so if—

(a)the order was made on his application; or

(b)in the case of a [F13child arrangements] order, he is named in [F14provisions of the order regulating arrangements relating to—

(i)with whom the child concerned is to spend time or otherwise have contact, or

(ii)when the child is to spend time or otherwise have contact with any person.]

(7)Any person who falls within a category of person prescribed by rules of court is entitled to apply for any such section 8 order as may be prescribed in relation to that category of person.

[F15(7A)If a special guardianship order is in force with respect to a child, an application for a [F16child arrangements order to which subsection (7B) applies ] may only be made with respect to him, if apart from this subsection the leave of the court is not required, with such leave.]

[F17(7B)This subsection applies to a child arrangements order if the arrangements regulated by the order consist of, or include, arrangements which relate to either or both of the following—

(a)with whom the child concerned is to live, and

(b)when the child is to live with any person.]

(8)Where the person applying for leave to make an application for a section 8 order is the child concerned, the court may only grant leave if it is satisfied that he has sufficient understanding to make the proposed application for the section 8 order.

(9)Where the person applying for leave to make an application for a section 8 order is not the child concerned, the court shall, in deciding whether or not to grant leave, have particular regard to—

(a)the nature of the proposed application for the section 8 order;

(b)the applicant’s connection with the child;

(c)any risk there might be of that proposed application disrupting the child’s life to such an extent that he would be harmed by it; and

(d)where the child is being looked after by a local authority—

(i)the authority’s plans for the child’s future; and

(ii)the wishes and feelings of the child’s parents.

(10)The period of three years mentioned in subsection (5)(b) need not be continuous but must not have begun more than five years before, or ended more than three months before, the making of the application.

Wednesday 3rd June 2020

       Proclamation News and Gatherence

SUBSCRIBE NEWS

• 

36 mins ago

Why Can’t the SNP Treat us like Adults?

Government should target the serial offenders, not the entire population

THE First Minster’s threat to increase lockdown legislation if people “fail to do the right thing” (“Sturgeon’s lockdown threat despite 50% drop in testing”, The Herald, June 2) reeks of paternalism. We are already three weeks behind the rest of the UK with regard to the lockdown.

The SNP-led Scottish Government has lectured us for more than a decade about our eating, smoking and drinking habits, all to no avail for the most part. A bloated body of NGOs, third sector organisations and charities in Scotland is testament to this.

“Again as I always suggest, Nicola Sturgeon, has a will and she will always have a way, as she’s SNP prime minister and in Scotland.  She’s diplomatic it’s about time the democracy support that.”

Proclamation News and Gatherence

@ukparliament

@conservativereview

@scotlandisnow

Proclamation News and Gatherence

(The Monk)

They do the things that make them communal — Mass, prayer, reflection, service. They also do the things that make them unique — exercise, collecting, composing, cooking. At Saint Meinrad, there’s time to be by yourself, just you and God.

Most Monks are Christian also.

“They concentrate on physical and mental well being”..

Being in control of your own thoughts and actions 

Mindfulness/Creativeness/Awareness/Mind-Control

“Prodigious Prominent Professor Johnson”

Born and dispatched in the Postmodernism Era

Some of us don’t know how grounded people act, truly because they don’t understand or read English literature or multiculturalism religious studies.

I was born to be focused, physically and mentally.  05/09/1983

@ukparliament

@conservativereview

studied the arts and humanities have excellent problem-solving skills and are good communicators, which are invaluable transferable skills. So, too, are critical thinking and creativity, also understanding of history and geography, English literature, philosophy and creative writing.. Use of fundamental computer skills. Formal writing, calculating, stories to poem’s, creating emails, working your open university database, entering online forums.. All the key skills to get into the business database which will eventually be hands on approach to many business industry’s.studied the arts and humanities have excellent problem-solving skills and are good communicators, which are invaluable transferable skills. So, too, are critical thinking and creativity, 

Writer/philosopher/Creator/JustinJohnson

studied the arts and humanities have excellent problem-solving skills and are good communicators, which are invaluable transferable skills. So, too, are critical thinking and creativity, also understanding of history and geography, English literature, philosophy and creative writing.. Use of fundamental computer skills. Formal writing, calculating, stories to poem’s, creating emails, working your open university database, entering online forums.. All the key skills to get into the business database which will eventually be hands on approach to many business industry’s.

Writer/philosopher/Creator/JustinJohnson