WELCOME LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.
Today we are going to work on Progressive Progression,
support the UK’S Dominion, firstly lets heirachly come together an support Proclamtion News and Gatherence.
It’s vocal, it’s charachterised, visualised and socialised..
Most defiantly Extraordinary to some of you whom don’t no my plan A since 1995 Media Studies Education via High school.
Thanks all to whom has tuned in today..
Please share and subscribe:
I have a huge wide spread jurisdiction and intellect on history within Politics an modern. Also a great idea of sports science, human biology as most of you will know me through my former live, yes an activist. Well not today or ever more..
A Socialist, part of the modern Aristocracy social Elite.
now we look at whats in store ahead of the week ahead,Nicola Sturgeon: I have support to remain first minister
Nicola Sturgeon has said she “emphatically” wants to remain as first minister for at least a few years.
Appearing on The Andrew Marr Show, the SNP leader said she believed she had the support of “party and of country” to hold her post.
It comes after party figures told BBC political correspondent Nick Eardley Ms Sturgeon may be in trouble.
She also defended a proposal for a “Scottish visa” system after the UK government unveiled immigration plans.
MSPs would decide the criteria for this new visa, and the Scottish government would receive and assess applications before sending them to the UK government for security checks.
The UK’s post-Brexit system, which was announced earlier this week, means that low-skilled workers would not get visas.
‘Damaging prosperity’
However Ms Sturgeon’s position is that this would cause “devastation” for Scotland’s economy as it would reduce the number of people entering the country with “restrictive” border controls.
There are concerns about Scotland’s ageing population and shrinking workforce, with the National Records of Scotland projecting that deaths could outweigh births over the next 25 years.
Scottish ministers say this means greater inward migration is needed to boost Scotland’s working-age population in particular, and that an end to freedom of movement could threaten this.
In a letter to Number 10 published on Sunday, Ms Sturgeon has called for a meeting with Boris Johnson to discuss immigration policy.
She told Andrew Marr she hopes to take a delegation of sectoral and business leaders to Downing Street to set out arguments for a different Scottish system.
She said: “You have a UK government that has as an expressed objective – reducing the number of people who come into the UK from other countries.
“My point is that that objective – in and of itself – is deeply damaging to Scotland’s economy and our future prosperity.
“It will make us poorer and that is why I really want to see this change and for Scotland’s interests to be recognised.”
The UK government, however, has urged employers to “move away” from relying on “cheap labour” from Europe and invest in retaining staff and developing automation technology.
And the Migration Advisory Committee has said Scotland’s needs are “not sufficiently different” from the rest of the UK to justify a “very different” system, with the north of England facing similar issues.
Ms Sturgeon said there was “not a shred of evidence” to support the idea that Scottish jobs had been undercut and called for more powers over employment law to ensure fair working conditions.
She said: “There is much evidence to the contrary including the views of the migration advisory committee – that immigration and EU immigration in particular does not drive down wages, either in the Scottish economy or in the UK economy.
“Migrants make a net contribution to our economy. If we have a problem of low wages or working conditions not being what they should be, that’s about poor regulation in the UK economy.”
A UK government spokesman said: “Our new points-based immigration system will work in the interests of the whole of the United Kingdom.
“We will continue to work with stakeholders and industry in Scotland to ensure the new proposals work for all sectors.”
Future as leader
Earlier this week Nick Eardley wrote that a number of SNP figures said Ms Sturgeon may have to “fall on her sword” amid increasing discussions over her future.
When asked if she would remain in her position as leader of Scotland, Ms Sturgeon said there were two conditions to consider.
She said: “Firstly you have to have the support, not just of party but of country, and I would say humbly that I’ve just led my party to another landslide election victory.
“Secondly I have to be sure that I want to do this job, think I’m the best person to to this job, have the drive and energy – and that is emphatically the case.”
Marr also pushed Ms Sturgeon on whether she would look to hold another referendum on Scottish independence this year, despite the prime minister’s flat refusal.
She reiterated her call for independence supporters to “be patient” but said it was important to continue arguing for another vote as the UK government negotiates its “future relationship with Europe”.
“I think it’s important that Scotland decides whether or not it wants to go down that road and if it doesn’t we start to plot a better route forward,” she said.
Ms Sturgeon added that she does not rule out “testing the limit of the power of the Scottish Parliament” in court – but it was not an option she was “actively looking at”.
She has previously ruled out the possibility of holding an unofficial referendum similar to the one in Catalonia in 2017.
Diane Abbott confirms she will stand down from Shadow Cabinet
Diane Abbott has confirmed she will stand down from the shadow Cabinet whoever wins the Labour leadership contest.
The Shadow Home Secretary said the person who replaces Jeremy Corbyn has to be able to create their own top team and move the party forward.
Her comments came after Mr Corbyn indicated he would be willing to serve in another senior position once he steps down as leader.
And Rebecca Long-Bailey, one of the candidates in the contest, has said she would be willing to offer him a position if she wins.
But asked about Mr Corbyn on Sky News’ Ridge on Sunday, Ms Abbott sought to clarify her own position, saying: “I will be stepping down because I think the new leader has to be able to construct their own shadow cabinet.”
She added: “I was a backbencher for a few years and there’s an awful lot to do on the backbenches.
“One of the things that I will want to do is make sure we don’t make a swerve to the right on migration policy.
“I think that’s a dead-end for the Labour Party.
“We have to stand by our principles and stand by our values and make sure we have an immigration policy which is fair and workable.”
The veteran MP said whatever the party decides her view will be “I support free movement”, as she attacked the Government’s new post-Brexit immigration plans.
She said the “notion of control” over borders should not be the starting point of the new points-based system, saying: “We should be starting from what are the needs of the economy.”
And she added: ”You are not going to suddenly replace the EU migrants unable to come here.
“This is a very misconceived policy – it’s all about giving the impression of being hawkish on migration.”
Ms Abbott said: “I don’t think the Home Office is full of individual racists, but I do think they run a system which is detrimental to black and brown migrants.”
House of Lords under fire for ‘out of control’ expenses as bill hits £23m a year
The House of Lords is facing criticism after it was revealed peers’ expense claims have risen by 29% in a year, taking the total bill to £23million.
According to The Sunday Times, the average tax-free bill by members of the upper chamber was around £31,000, with 31 claiming over £77,000.
But the Lords defended its costs, claiming the rise is due to an increase in the number of days the House sat.
They are also set to get a pay rise in March of 3.1%, taking their daily attendance allowance to £323.
SNP MP Kirsten Oswald criticised the decision in the Commons last week, pointing out the daily rate was the same as the monthly payout for Universal Credit claimants.
The Sunday Times’ analysis found one peer, Lord Cunningham, claimed £79,000 last year, while making just 17 spoken contributions in the House.
And Lord Paul claimed £48,000 in expenses despite his £2billion family fortune, and spoke only once in the chamber.
Millionaire Lord Bhatia, who has previously been suspended from the House over expense claims, cashed in £44,530 in expenses after turning up 149 out of a possible 161 days — yet did not address the House or sit on a committee.
More than 110 peers did not make any spoken or written contribution to the House during the year to March, it was found, but claimed a total of more than £1million.
A spokesperson for the House of Lords said: “The increase in the costs of House of Lords allowances in the 2018/19 financial year is largely due to a 25% increase in the number of days that the House sat, rising from 129 in 2017/18 to 161 in 2018/19.
“As Members of the Lords can generally only claim allowances for days they attend the House any increase in sitting days is likely to produce an increase in the cost of Member’s allowances.”
They also defended the upper chamber’s record, adding: “The House of Lords is a busy and effective revising chamber which does an important job scrutinising legislation and holding the Government to account.
“In the period covered by the Sunday Times article it made 2,513 changes to legislation; members tabled 8,072 written questions and 153 reports were produced by committee.”
Theresa May warned to expect criticism in Windrush report
Theresa May has been warned to expect criticism in an upcoming independent review into the Windrush scandal.
The former Tory PM served as Home Secretary under David Cameron between 2010 and 2016, and oversaw a “hostile environment” policy while Caribbean migrants were deported despite having the right to live in Britain.
More than 80 Commonwealth citizens were deported despite having a legal right to remain in the UK.
According to the Times, Mrs May has been written to on behalf of the review, giving her the opportunity to respond to criticisms.
The government’s willingness to deport ethnic minorities has reignited criticism in recent weeks, after more than 170 MPs called for a flight carrying 50 Jamaican deportees to be halted.
It is understood some of those concerned came to Britain as children and, in the words of Labour MP Diane Abbott, “have no memory” of their country of birth.
A leaked draft of the Windrush review said the government should consider ending the deportation of foreign-born offenders who came to the UK as children.
Home Secretary Priti Patel said each individual affected had been convicted of a “serious offence and received a custodial sentence of 12 months or more”.
She added that under legislation introduced by Labour in 2007, “a deportation order must be made”.
MP J Johnson 